Waffles: proving Bergson wrong since 1725

‘The first point to which attention should be called is that the comic does not exist outside the pale of what is strictly HUMAN. A landscape may be beautiful, charming and sublime, or insignificant and ugly; it will never be laughable.’

Bergson, Henri. Laughter : an Essay on the Meaning of the Comic

Is he right?  Is the falling waffle funny because we imagine it to be a person?  Bergson would argue that as the waffle is man-made, we are laughing at ‘the shape that men have given it’, and therefore, its human elements.  I’m not convinced, and if there is a counter example to his Human Theory, Waffle Falling Over is definitely it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s